Disposed¶23

Mithlesh Kumar v. South Eastern Coal Filelds Ltd.

Chhattisgarh HC9 Apr 2026WPS/13326/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition with liberty; representation before General Manager (SECL), Bishrampur to be decided within 03 months; petitioner Mithlesh Kumar (SECL Cat-I, Bishrampur/Surajpur); respondents South Eastern Coalfields officials; Chhattisgarh High Court; Parth Prateem Sahu, J.; order dated 10.04.2026; WPS No. 13326 of 2025; time-bound direction; respondents raised no objection.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a representation before respondent no. 3 (The General Manager (SECL), Bishrampur); respondent no. 3 to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within 03 months from receipt of the representation. ¶23

Mithlesh Kumar Vs South Eastern Coal Filelds Ltd. — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:16671

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 13326 of 2025

¶6

Mithlesh Kumar S/o Late Rajmal Aged About 50 Years Caste Chaudhary Occupation S.E.C.L. (Cat-I) R/o J.M.Q Colony House No. 56, Ward No. 14, Post And Tahsil Bishrampur District- Surajpur (C.G.)

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - South Eastern Coal Filelds Ltd. Through The Chairman Cum- Managing Director, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) -495006

¶10

2 - The Director Personnel (Secl), Tahsil Bishrampur District- Surajpur (C.G.)

¶11

3 - The General Manager (Secl), Bishrampur (C.G.)

¶12

ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.04.10 17:21:29 +0530

¶13

4 - The Sub Area Manager (Secl), Amgaon Open Cast Mines Post Bishrampur District- Surajpur (C.G.)

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶16

For Petitioner	: Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate
For Respondents	: Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate
Hon'	ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

¶17

Order on Board

¶18

10.04.2026

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file representation before the

¶20

¶21

respondent no. 3 and direction be issued to concerned authority to consider and take decision on representation at the earliest, within specified time frame.

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner he is having no objection.

¶23

On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition stands withdrawn with liberty as prayed for and if representation submitted by petitioner before respondent no. 3, it shall be considered and decided by respondent no. 3, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further time period of 03 months from the date of receipt of representation.

¶24

Certified copy as per rules. sd/-

¶25

(Parth Prateem Sahu) alfiza Judge

Mithlesh Kumar v. South Eastern Coal Filelds Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithlesh Kumar v. South Eastern Coal Filelds Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akilesh Mishra Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Abdul Haleem Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mukesh Bhatt Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manisha Parihar Vs South Eastern Coal Limited (S.E.C.L.)

Dhaneshri Barik Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Uttam Prasad Paikra Vs Shri Manish Kashyap