Dismissed¶20

Mukesh Bhatt v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC8 Apr 2026WPS/3114/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WPS No. 3114 of 2026; decided 09.04.2026 by Parth Prateem Sahu, J.; petitioner Mukesh Bhatt (Assistant Grade-3, Indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya Khairagarh); writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to pursue alternate remedy of appeal against impugned Order; maintainability objection by respondents 2-4; return of original documents by Registry.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail the alternate remedy available under the law; original documents to be returned to petitioner's counsel after photocopying. ¶20

Mukesh Bhatt Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

1 / 2

2026:CGHC:16292

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 3114 of 2026

¶6

Mukesh Bhatt S/o Late Ganesh Kumar Bhatt Aged About 41 Years Working On The Post Of Assistant Grade - 3 At Indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya, Khairagarh, Distt.- Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.), R/o Ward No. 08, Turkari Para, Khairagarh, Distt.- Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.)

¶7

... Petitioner(s)

¶8

Versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

2 - Indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya Khairagarh, Through Vice Chancellor Indira Gandhi Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya, Distt.- Khairagarh-ChhuikhadanGandai (C.G.)

¶11

3 - The Registrar Indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya Khairagarh, Distt.Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.)

¶12

4 - Assistant Registrar Indira Kala Sangit Vishwavidyalaya Khairagarh, Distt.Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai (C.G.)

¶13

... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Yogendra Chaturvedi, Advocate For Respondent No. 1-State : Mr. Suyash Dhar Badgaiyan, P.L. For Respondent No. 2 to 3 : Mr. Srijan Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Advocate

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge

ORDER ON BOARD

09.04.2026

2 / 2

1. Counsel for the respondent No. 2 to 4 raises an objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition and submits that the petitioner is having alternate remedy of appeal against the impugned Order.

¶19

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedy available, under the law.

¶20

3. In view of above submissions made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶21

4. Registry is directed to return the original documents enclosed with the writ petition to counsel for the petitioner after obtaining photocopies of the same.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

( Parth Prateem Sahu ) JUDGE

¶24

Saurabh

Mukesh Bhatt v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Bhatt v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lokesh Sahu Vs Shri Ankit Anand

Naresh Kumar Sonwani Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ashish Tiwari Vs Smt. K.K. Pushparjini

Rajesh Kumar Soni Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Archana Wanshi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

K. Laxman Rao Vs State of Chhattisgarh