Smt. Fatima Tigga v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh HC (Bilaspur), order dated 02-02-2026, Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J.: common disposal of five writ petitions (WPC Nos. 6694, 6695, 6702, 6717 of 2025 and 2 of 2026) by Jashpur-district petitioners (Cheruram, Anand Ram, Smt. Bibiyanti, Smt. Fatima Tigga, Premprakash Bek) claiming compensation under Rajmohni Devi Tendupatta Samajik Suraksha Yojya; petitions not pressed on merits; liberty reserved to submit fresh representations; competent authority to decide in accordance with law preferably within 3 months of receipt; Court expressed no opinion on merits; pending IAs disposed; petitioners' counsel: Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi and Sukhnath Ram Bhagat; State counsel: Gary Mukhopadhyay (Addl. Adv. General); Sangh counsel: Armaan Memon.
What did the court decide?
Liberty reserved to the petitioners to submit fresh representations before the concerned authority; the authority shall consider and decide them in accordance with law, preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of representations. The Court expressly expressed no opinion on the merits.