Prakash Bhuarya v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh HC Bilaspur single judge Amitendra Kishore Prasad, 30/06/2026, WPC 3189/2026 and 17 connected writ petitions by paddy procurement centre in-charges/managers (Samiti Adim Jati Seva Sahkari Samiti) of Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki and Surajpur districts; subject: paddy weight shortage from natural dryness/dryage and moisture evaporation in Kharif Marketing Session 2025-26; reliefs for dryness-shortage protection, zero-shortage (Protsahan) incentive, expenditure after 31 March, halt to harassment, police pressure, FIR threats and coercive recovery by Collector/Deputy Registrar/District Marketing Officer/MARKFED (C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation)/District Cooperative Central Bank Rajnandgaon-Ambikapur; plea that rice millers got 5% dryness allowance (order dt. 15/05/2024 P/5) and societies 3% benefit in 2022 while Policy clauses 15.9 and 16.3 allow no dryage and shift transport duty to societies with MARKFED adjustment; held: writ remedy barred by alternative efficacious remedy of arbitration under Clause 13 of tri-party Agreement (recovery under Clause 5.6); petitioners relegated to arbitration; authorities to decide per law; no opinion on merits; petitions disposed, not decided on merits; keywords: paddy procurement center, zero shortage, tri-party agreement, MARKFED, KMS 2025-2026, alternative remedy, writ disposed.