Arvind Shankar Rao Kher Vs State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1

¶2

Digitally signed byRAVI RAVISHANKAR SHANKARMANDAVI MANDAVI Date: 2026.07.21 11:07:30 +0530

CGHC010061832021

2026:CGHC:30115

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶7

WPC No. 1457 of 2021

¶8

1 - Vikram Tejwani S/o Shri Shrichand Tejwani Aged About 36 Years R/o Gulmohar Colony, Beladula, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶9

2 - Girish Tejwani S/o Shri Shrichand Tejwani Aged About 28 Years R/o Gulmohar Colony, Beladula , Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶10

--- Petitioner(s)

¶11

versus

¶12

1 - State of Chhattisgarh, through- the Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶13

2 - The Collector District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶14

3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) / Land Acquision Officer Raigarh , District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶15

4 - The Director of Industries Udyog Bhawan, Telibandhab Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶16

5 - The Chief General Manager, District Trade and Industries Centre, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶17

2

¶18

6 - The General Manager N.T.P.C. Limited , Lara , Tahsil Pusore District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶19

--- Respondent(s)

¶20

WPC No. 1458 of 2021

¶21

1 - Arvind Shankar Rao Kher S/o Late Shankar Vinayak Rao Kher, aged About 71 Years R/o Gali No. 1, Vikas Nagar, Kotra Road, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶22

2 - Smt. Anuradha Kher W/o Shri Arvind Shankar Rao Kher, aged About 69 Years R/o Gali No. 01, Vikas Nagar, Kotra Road, Raigarh , Tahsil and District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶23

--- Petitioner(s)

¶24

Versus

¶25

1 - State of Chhattisgarh, through- the Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶26

2 - The Collector District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶27

3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) / Land Acquision Officer Raigarh , District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶28

4 - The Director of Industries Udyog Bhawan, Telibandhab Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶29

5 - The Chief General Manager District Trade and Industries Centre, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶30

6 - The General Manager N.T.P.C. Limited , Lara , Tahsil Pusore District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

¶31

--- Respondent(s)

¶32

(Cause title is taken from CIS)

¶33

For Petitioners in both cases	: Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate
For State/Respondents	: Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. G.A.
For respondent No.5	: None

¶34

3

¶35

For respondent No.6 in both : Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate cases

¶36

SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge

¶37

Order on Board

¶38

15/07/2026

¶39

Learned counsel for the respective respondents raises objection with regard to maintainability of both the petitions and would submit that in the facts of the case, nature of dispute raised by the petitioners, the petitioners are having efficacious remedy available under Section 76 of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013 (herein after refereed as ‘Act, 2013’).

¶40

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have purchased the land subject matter of acquisition through registered sale deed from one of its joint owner of the property and their name were also recorded in the revenue records, however, at the time of initiation of land acquisition proceeding and passing of the award, name of petitioners have neither been mentioned in the proceedings nor in the award, he however submits that in view of the objections raised by learned counsel for the respective respondents, he may be permitted to withdraw both the writ petitions with liberty to avail other remedy available under Act, 2013.

¶41

4

¶42

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, both the writ petitions are disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail other remedy available under Act, 2013 for redressal of their grievance, as have been raised in the respective petitions.

¶43

With the aforesaid observation, direction and liberty to the petitioners, both these writ petitions are disposed of .

¶44

Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge

¶45

Ravi Mandavi

Arvind Shankar Rao Kher v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Shankar Rao Kher v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dashrath Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sanjay Kumar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Devendra Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Hargovind Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Janki Bai Suryavansi (Died) Through Legal Heirs Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Vs Amar Singh