Manohar Sahu Alias Kartik Sahu Vs Prafull Kumar Sahu

¶1

1

¶2

2026:CGHC:13204

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 1195 of 2026

¶6

Manohar Sahu Alias Kartik Sahu S/o Late Konda Prasad Sahu Aged About 72 Years R/o Village Arang, Ward No. 9, Bargudi Para, Arang, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - Prafull Kumar Sahu S/o Manohar @ Kartik Sahu Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Arang, Ward No. 5, House No. 196 And 212, Near Samiya Mata Temple, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

2 - Lukesh Kumar Sahu S/o Manohar Kartik Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Arang, Ward No. 5, House No. 196 And 212, Near Samiya Mata Temple, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

3 - Sub Divisional Officer Arang, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Sweksha Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.3/State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer

¶13

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶14

Order on Board

¶15

19/03/2026

¶16

1. By way of filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks issuance of direction to respondent No.3/Sub Divisional Officer, Arang, Distt. Raipur (CG) to decide the Revenue Case No.202306112400061-/B-121/ 2022-23 expeditiously.

¶17

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, a senior citizen aged about 72 years, has filed an application (Annexure-P/2) under

¶18

Digitally
signed by
BINI
BINI PRADEEP
PRADEEP Date:
2026.03.20
10:54:37
+0530

¶19

2

¶20

Section 4 read with Section 5 and Section 24 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 , seeking maintenance and eviction of respondents 1 & 2 from his house. The said application was registered as a revenue case by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Arang, Distt. Raipur on 11.5.2023. It is further submitted that despite lapse of more than 2 ½ years, aforesaid case has not been decided yet. Hence, it is prayed that respondent No.3 may be directed to decide the aforesaid revenue case within the stipulated period.

¶21

3. Learned counsel for the State submits that above mentioned revenue case will be decided within the period specified by this Court.

¶22

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶23

5. Having considered the limited prayer of the petitioner and also considering the contention of learned counsel for the State, without going into the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of at this stage, directing respondent No.3/Sub Divisional Officer, Arang, Distt. Raipur to decide Revenue Case No.202306112400061-/B-121/2022-23, within a period of 30 days from today. Learned counsel for the State is also directed to apprise respondent No.3 about this order.

¶24

6. With aforesaid observation and direction, this petition stands disposed of.

¶25

7. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶28

Judge

¶29

Bini

Manohar Sahu Alias Kartik Sahu v. Prafull Kumar Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manohar Sahu Alias Kartik Sahu v. Prafull Kumar Sahu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chanda Jaiswal Vs Union of India

Anil Kumar Pali Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Laxman Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Yogesh Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Asharam Kanwar Vs the Project Director

Purshottam Vs the Project Director