Chanda Jaiswal Vs Union of India

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department, Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi , Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶13

3 - Commissoiner Division Surguja District- Surguja Chhattisgarh

¶14

4 - Collector, Surguja District- Surguja Chhattisgarh

¶15

5 - Land Acquisition Officer Cum Sub Divisional Officer Revenue, Ambikapur, District- Surguja Chhattisgarh

¶16

6 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department National Highway Zone Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattisgarh

¶17

7 - Patwari, Village Bhakura, Patwari, Halka No. 52, Rajasv Nigam Mandal Ambkapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh

¶18

--- Respondent(s)

¶19

2

¶20

For Petitioner	: Mr.SanjayPathak,Adv.
For Respondent/UOI	: Ms. Anmol Sharma, Central Govt.
	Counsel
For Respondents No. 2, to 5 and 7	: Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Adv. General

¶21

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

¶22

Order On Board

¶23

18-3-2026

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is the owner and occupant of land bearing Khasra No. 538/9 and 538/10 situated at village Bhakura, Tehsil Ambikapur. The respondents are constructing National Highway, to which some portion of her land has been acquired and remaining land about 4 desmil has not been acquired, but the respondent are going to demolish the petitioner’s residential house situated over the unacquired land by changing the alignment of the Highway. He further submits that, once map for construction of National Highway is made, then alignment ought not to be changed. He also submits that, petitioner has filed representation dated 2-32026 before the respondent No. 4 /Collector, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja. Hence this writ petition may be disposed of directing the respondent No. 3 to decide her aforesaid application within stipulated period.

¶25

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to allow above limited prayer.

¶26

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶27

3

¶28

Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of at this stage, with a direction to the respondent 3/ Collector, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja to decide the representation dated 2-3-2026 filed by the petitioner in accordance with law, within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶29

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

¶30

Sd/-

¶31

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶32

pathak

Chanda Jaiswal v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chanda Jaiswal v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Ajooba Radhakrishnan Vs Union of India

Devashish Vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited

Smt. Ruhi Agrawal Vs Raipur Development Authority

Ramjan Ali Urf Balla Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Lalta Vs South Eastern Coalfield Limited

Kachri Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh