Dismissed¶21

Yogesh Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC18 Mar 2026WPC/1219/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPC No. 1219 of 2026; Yogesh Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh & others; withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file fresh better constituted petition; respondents' counsel raised no objection; single Bench; Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi; order dated 19/03/2026; NAFR; neutral citation 2026:CGHC:13344; no statutory provisions, precedents, impugned order, or monetary amounts appear in the order.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh, better constituted petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with that liberty. ¶21

Yogesh Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:13344

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 1219 of 2026

¶6

Yogesh Verma S/o Shiv Kumar Verma Aged About 37 Years R/o Marble Market, Chhattisgarh Nagar, Tikarapara, District- Raipur, C.G.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G.

¶10

2 - Municipal Corporation Through Its Commissioner, District- Raipur, C.G.

¶11

3 - Zone Commissioner, Zone No. 10 Municipal Corporation, District- Raipur, C.G.

¶12

4 - Collector, District- Raipur, C.G.

¶13

		... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner	:	Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate.
For Respondents No. 1 & 4	:	Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Adv. General
For respondents No. 2 & 3	:	Mr. PankajAgrawal, Advocate.

¶14

{Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi}

¶15

Order on Board

¶16

19/03/2026

¶17

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh better constituted petition.

¶18

Counsel for the respondents have no objection to allow the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner.

¶19

¶20

On due consideration, the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to do so.

¶21

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶24

Judge

¶25

amit

Yogesh Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chanda Jaiswal Vs Union of India

Anil Kumar Pali Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Laxman Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Asharam Kanwar Vs the Project Director

Purshottam Vs the Project Director

Mangal Singh Kanwar Vs the Project Director