(A) Bhajju(Died) through LRs. Somaro Bai v. Shankar
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal (SA No. 471 of 2019), High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, dismissed for want of prosecution on 28/01/2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J., because nobody appeared for the appellants on repeated calls. Parties are residents of Surajpur district (formerly Surguja), Chhattisgarh; cause-title marks respondent No. 8 '(Plaintiffs)' and respondent No. 21 (State of Chhattisgarh) '(Defendants)'. Counsel: none for appellants; Lekhram Dhruv, P.L. for Respondent/State. Order marked 'NAFR'; neutral citation 2026:CGHC:4608. No issues argued, no statutes or precedents cited, no monetary relief.
What did the court decide?
As no one appeared on behalf of the appellant despite repeated calls, the Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. ¶39