Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu Vs Rameshwar Prasad

¶1

1

2026:CGHC:4385

NAFR

AMARDEEP CHOUBEY

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.01.27 17:47:56 +0530

¶7

SA No. 366 of 2020

¶8

1 - Rameshvar Prasad Sahu S/o Late Shobharam Sahu Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Beeja, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

2 - Upendra Kumar @ Barsati Sahu S/o Shri Rameshvar Prasad Sahu Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Beeja, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

3 - Bhupendra Kumar @ Umesh @ Munchu Sahu S/o Shri Rameshvar Prasad Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Beeja, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

4 - Ramkunwar @ Mankunwar Sahu W/o Shri Rameshvar Prasad Sahu Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Beeja, Tehsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

... Appellants

¶13

versus

¶14

1 - Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu W/o Parasram Sahu Aged About 68 Years R/o Puja Building, Amala Chowk Barela Tahsil Mungeli Then District Bilaspur, Now District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.

¶15

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Bilaspur, Now Collector Mungeli, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶16

... Respondent(s)

¶17

For Appellants	: Shri Suresh Kumar Pandey, Advocate.
For Respondent No. 1	: Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate
For Respondent/State	: Shri Anand Gupta, Dy.G.A.

¶18

2

¶19

SA No. 27 of 2020

¶20

Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu D/o Shobharam Sahu Aged About 68 Years W/o Parasram Sahu, R/o Pooja Building, Amha Chowk, Barela, Tahsil And District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶21

... Appellant

¶22

versus

¶23

1 - Rameshwar Prasad S/o Shobharam Sahu Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Bija, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶24

2 - Upendra Kumar @ Barsati S/o Rameshwar Prasad Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Bija, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶25

3 - Bhupendra Kumar @ Ramesh @ Munyu S/o Rameshwar Prasad Sahu Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Bija, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶26

4 - Smt. Ramkunwar @ Mankunwar W/o Rameshwar Prasad Sahu Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Bija, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶27

5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶28

... Respondent(s)

¶29

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶30

For Appellant : Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents : Shri Suresh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Anand Gupta, Dy.G.A. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Order on Board

3

27/01/2026

1. By the appeal i.e. SA No.366 of 2020 under Section 100 of the CPC, the appellants/defendants challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 08/11/2019 passed by the learned 6^th Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, C.G. in Civil Appeal No.55-A/2019 (Rameshwar Prasad & Ors Vs. Smt. Kanti Bai & Anr) arising out of the judgment dated 16/01/2019 passed by the learned Civil Judge Class-II, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, C.G. in Civil Suit No.30A/11 (Smt. Kanti Bai Vs. Rameshwar Prasad & Ors). For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred as per their status before the learned trial Court.

¶35

2. By the appeal i.e. SA No.27 of 2020 under Section 100 of the CPC, the appellant/plaintiff challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 08/11/2019 passed by the learned 6^th Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, C.G. in Civil Appeal No.55-A/2019 (Rameshwar Prasad & Ors Vs. Smt. Kanti Bai & Anr) arising out of the judgment dated 16/01/2019 passed by the learned Civil Judge Class-II, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, C.G. in Civil Suit No.30A/11 (Smt. Kanti Bai Vs. Rameshwar Prasad & Ors). For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred as per their status before the learned trial Court.

¶36

3. Pursuant to the order dated 10.07.2025, these matters were referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court. As per the mediation report dated 22.07.2025 , the parties appeared before

¶37

4

¶38

the Mediation Centre and the dispute was amicably settled by executing a settlement agreement before the Mediation Centre.

¶39

4. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the dispute between the parties has been settled and the parties are ready and willing to fulfill the conditions enumerated in the settlement recorded by the Mediation Centre of this Court.

¶40

5. For the sake of convenience the mediation report dated 22.07.2025 is reproduced as under:-

¶41

समझौ�ता�पत्र

¶42

यहकि�अपी�ला�र्थी�श्री�मती��ती�बा�ईसा�हू��द्वा�रा�प्रस्ती�तीअकिपीला �. SA No. 27/2020 Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu Vs. Rameshwar Prasad Sahu and Ors. एवं�अपी�ला�र्थी�गण रा�म�शवंराप्रसा�दसा�हूएवं�अन्यद्वा�रा�प्रस्ती�तीअपी�ला�. SA No. 366/2020 Rameshwar Prasad Sahu and Ors. Vs. Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu and Ors. �! द!नों# ह�अपी�ला�र्थी�गण ��द्वा�रा�आपीसा�साहमती�एवं�राजा�मद& सा�साम�प्ती�रानों��किनोंण(य लिलाय�ह*।

¶43

यहकि�श्री�मती��ती�बा�ईसा�हूजा! �, रा�म�शवंराप्रसा�दसा�हू�, साग�बाड़ी�बाहनोंह* औरास्वं. श!भा�रा�मसा�हू�, सा�ती�नोंह*।श!भा�रा�म सा�हू��म0त्य��पीश्चा�तीद!नों# भा�ई-बाहनों (अपी�ला�र्थी�गण) �! पीती0� सा�पीत्ती�जा! कि�ग्रा�मबा�जा�पी.ह.नों. 8 रा�किनोंमतीखतीपी�रावंतीहसा�ला तीखतीपी�राजिजाला�किबाला�सापी�रा��खसारा�नों. 1819 रा�बा� 0.02 ए�ड़ी, ख.नों�. 149/1 रा�बा� 1.37 ए�ड़ी, ख.नों�. 364 रा�बा� 1.00 ए�ड़ी, ख.नों�. 385 रा�बा� 1.22 ए�ड़ी, ख.नों�. 1423 रा�बा� 0.65 ए�ड़ी, ख.नों�. 1526/2 रा�बा� 0.57 ए�ड़ी, खसारा�नों�बारा 311 रा�बा� 0.206 ह�क्टे�यरा, ख.नों�. 362 ह�क्टे�यरा 0.36 एवं�ख.नों�. 1598 ए�बा� 0.162 ह�क्टे�यरावं�द&/उत्तीरावं�द& �म� ��कितीबा�ई�, पीती0� सा�पीत् त ह*, जिजासापीराउसा�� 1/4 अ�शह*।उसा�अपीनों�भा�ईश्री� रा�म�शवंराप्रसा�दसा�हूएवं�उसा��वं�रा�श�नोंश्री�उपी�द्र��म�रासा�हू, श्री� उम�श��म�रासा�हूएवं�श्री�मती�म�नों��वंरासा�हू�! प्रद�नों�राअपीनों�

¶44

5

¶45

पीती0�सा�पीत्ती�सा�प्र�प्तीसा�पी<ण( अ�श/किहस्सा��! किबानों�कि�सा�भाय, ला�लाच, एवं�दबा�वं��अपीनों�किहस्सा��त्य�ग�राती�ह एवं�अपीनों�द्वा�रा� प्रस्ती�तीअपी�ला�! म�नोंनों�यन्य�य�लायसा�वं�पीसाला � राप्र�राण साम�प्ती �रा�ग�।

¶46

उसा�प्र��राअपी�ला�र्थी�गणरा�म�शवंराप्रसा�दसा�हूएवं�अन्य��द्वा�रा� प्रस्ती�तीअपी�लाउपीरा!क्तीवंर् ण ि?तीशती@ �! स्वं��रा�राती�हुएअपी�ला �. SA 366/2020 �! म�नोंनों�यउच्चन्य�य�लायसा�वं�पीसाला � रा प्र�राणसाम�प्ती�राCग�।

¶47

उभायपीक्षइसासामझौGती�पीत्र�, शती@ सा�साहमतीहI एवं�पी�लानों�� लिलाए�टेबाद्धहI �रा�रानों�म�मC द& गईशती@ �! उन्ह#नों�अपीनों�स्वंय� �, स्वं�च्छा�पी<वं(�साहमकितीएवं�किबानों�कि�सा�दबा�वं, भायएवं�ला�लाच�� स्वं��राकि�य�गय�ह* उभायपीक्षनों�इसा�रा�रानों�म��, शती@ �! पीढ़नों� वंसामझौनों��पीश्चा�तीअपीनों�स्वंती�त्रसाहमकितीसा�पीरास्पराए�-दूसारा��, उपीस्थिPकितीमC हस्ती�क्षरा�राकिनोंष्पी�दिदतीकि�य�।

¶48

6. The disputes between the parties have been settled in mediation by executing a compromise deed. The mediation compromise deed will be a part of the records. In the above circumstances, both the appeals are disposed of in terms of the mediation compromise deed dated 22/07/2025. The mediation compromise deed shall form part of the judgment.

¶49

7. A decree be drawn accordingly.

¶50

(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge

¶51

Amardeep

Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu v. Rameshwar Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Kanti Bai Sahu v. Rameshwar Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Dubey Vs Krishna Kant Dubey, Alias K.K. Dubey (Died) Through Lrs.

Madhusudan Majumdar Vs Jagdish Sarkar

Singhal Distributors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Subhashish Shaha

Sumit Panika Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhuvneshwar Vs Fagulal

Lalit Ganvir Vs Central Bureau of Investigation CBI