Bhuvneshwar v. Fagulal
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; SA No. 378 of 2016; SA No. 379 of 2016; dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal of appeals; appellants Bhuvneshwar, Damodar, Balmati (S/D/o Jagmohan), cultivators, Caste Aghariya, Village Charbhanta, Tahsil and District Raigarh; respondents Fagulal S/o Jagmohan (cultivator and retired teacher; Village Charbhanta in SA 378, Village Devri in SA 379); Manbodh Tigga (deleted as per Court order dated 04.07.2017); State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Raigarh; Shri Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate for appellants; Shri Lekhram Dhruv, Panel Lawyer for Respondent/State; Hon'ble Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge; order dated 27.01.2026; NAFR; no merits decided; no statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of both appeals permitted on the appellants' instructions; SA No. 378 of 2016 and SA No. 379 of 2016 dismissed as withdrawn, without any adjudication on merits.