Dr. Gaurishankar Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1

¶2

CGHC010169202026 2026:CGHC:30254

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

REVP No. 153 of 2026

¶6

Dr. Gaurishankar Patel S/o Shri Ramprasad Patel Aged About 55 Years Occupation -Ayurvedic Medical Officer (Contract), Primary Health Ayush Kendra Rampur Village And Post Rampur Tahsil Dongargaon, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh

¶7

--- Petitioner(s)

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare Mantralya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur District Chhattisgarh

¶10

2 - Director Ayush Chhattisgarh Government, Directorate, Ayush Chhattisgarh D.K.S.Campus,raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

3 - District Ayush Officer Rajnandgaon District -Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh

¶12

--- Respondent(s)

¶13

(Cause title is taken from CIS system)

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr. Atul Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. G.A.

¶15

BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

¶17

Order On Board

¶18

16/07/2026

¶19

With the consent of the parties, the case is heard finally.

¶20

2

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertent mistake along with the writ petition circular dated 28.05.2010 was filed to submit that State government has already issued a circular for regularisation of service of the contract employees. Considering the submission made and the documents enclosed, the writ petition was disposed of in the light of the said circular however, petitioner subsequently revealed that the circular which was filed as Annexure P/12 was held to be a forged circular by the State government in its circular dated 21.06.2010 and therefore the order passed disposing the writ petition be reviewed and recalled. He also submits that petitioner has not submitted representation pursuant to the order passed in the writ petition. It is also the contention of counsel for the petitioner that the circular which is filed alongwith writ petition is dated 28.05.2010 and it has come to the knowledge of the State Government that the said circular is forged and fabricated one and accordingly it has been clarified vide circular dated 21.06.2010. As there is no ill intention on the part of the petitioner, the order passed in the writ petition may be recalled.

¶22

Learned counsel for the State submits that pursuant to the observation made by this Court he has verified about the filing of representation pursuant to the order passed in writ petition and according to his instructions petitioner has not submitted representation. Further decision has been taken to take action against the concerned petitioner.

¶23

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶24

3

¶25

The petitioner is working as Ayurved Medical Officer (Contract). From the documents enclosed along with this review application, in particular, Annexure P/2 which is the circular issued by the State government dated 21.06.2010, it is appearing that the forged circular came to the knowledge of the State government and within few days clarificatory circular has been issued informing the respective authorities. As submitted by counsel for petitioner that petitioner was not aware about the veracity of the circular dated 28.05.2010 filed alongwith writ petition.

¶26

From the pleadings made in the review application and considering the submission of counsel for petitioner, as also considering that writ petition was disposed of directing respondent authority to take decision considering circular dated 28.05.2010, which could not be complied with, in the opinion of this Court the petitioner has made out a case for review of the order, subject matter of the review petition.

¶27

Accordingly, the order dated 05.01.2026 passed in WPS No. 14119 of 2025 is recalled. Writ petition is restored to its original number.

¶28

Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge

¶29

Balram

Dr. Gaurishankar Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Gaurishankar Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Jaiswal Vs Vijay Kumar Sidar

Vikram Tejwani Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Arvind Shankar Rao Kher Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Sushma Agrawal, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shelly Sonkar Vs Union of India

Aniruddh Koche Vs State of Chhattisgarh