Disposed¶26

Mannu Ram Nishad v. Kishan Lal Chouhan

Chhattisgarh HC24 Mar 2026MCC/16/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration application allowed; W.P.(S) No.3970 of 2022 restored to original number subject to cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to High Court Bar Library Fund; grounds: non-appearance on 29.8.2025 due to unavoidable circumstances, petitioner desirous of prosecuting case; respondents opposed; petition disposed of. Keywords: restoration of writ petition; non-appearance on hearing date; unavoidable circumstances; High Court Bar Library Fund cost; MCC No. 16 of 2026; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey; Mannu Ram Nishad v. Kishan Lal Chouhan, Commissioner Durg Division, SDO (Revenue) Bemetara, Tehsildar Bemetara, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Mau.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of WP(S) No.3970 of 2022 to its original number, subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to High Court Bar Library Fund.

Mannu Ram Nishad Vs Kishan Lal Chouhan — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:14345

NAFR

NIRMALA RAO

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MCC No. 16 of 2026

¶7

1 - Mannu Ram Nishad S/o Shri Narad Nishad Aged About 38 Years R/o Vill. Mau, Tah. And District - Bemetara (C.G.)

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - Kishan Lal Chouhan S/o Shri Puran Lal Chouhan, R/o Vill. Parsada, Tah. Nawagarh, Dist.Bemetara (C.G.)

¶11

2 - The Commissioner Durg Division, Dist. - Durg (C.G.)

¶12

3 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bemetara Dist. - Bemetara (C.G.)

¶13

4 - The Tehsildar Bemetara Dist. - Bemetara (C.G.)

¶14

5 - The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Mau, Tah. And Dist. - Bemetara (C.G.)

¶15

... Respondent(s)

¶16

(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)

¶17

For Petitioner/s : Shri Anchal Kumar Matre, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Shri Mahendra Chauhan, Advocate. For Respondent No.5 : Shri Kalpesh Ruparel, Advocate.

¶18

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board

¶19

2 5.03.2026

¶20

This is an application for restoration of W.P.(S) No.3970 of 2022.

¶21

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit on 29.8.2025, due to unavoidable circumstances, no one could appear when the matter was taken up for hearing. He would submit that the petitioner is interested in prosecuting the case. He would pray to allow this application.

¶23

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents would oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner.

¶24

I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents available on record.

¶25

Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and the reasons assigned in the application, the application for restoration is allowed and WP(S) No.3970 of 2022 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to High Court Bar Library Fund.

¶26

With the aforesaid observations, this petition is disposed of .

¶27

Sd/(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶28

Nimmi

Mannu Ram Nishad v. Kishan Lal Chouhan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mannu Ram Nishad v. Kishan Lal Chouhan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sohan Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mahendra Kumar Haloor Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajendra Prasad Manwatkar Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Amit Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh Pradesh Swasthya Karamchari Sangh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhupendra Kumar Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh