Dismissed¶24
Radhe Shyam Uke v. Syed Kazim Ali
Chhattisgarh HCFA/190/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; FA No. 190 of 2016; Radhe Shyam Uke (plaintiff/appellant) versus Syed Kazim Ali, Dharika Meshram, State of Chhattisgarh through Collector Bilaspur, Smt. Veena Dixit, Radhe Shyam Soni; decided 06.02.2026 by Hon'ble Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge; dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of appellant; appellant lost interest in pursuing appeal; no appearance or representation on behalf of appellant; civil first appeal; NAFR (not approved for reporting); no costs or quantum discussed.
What did the court decide?
Since none appeared or made any representation on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal, the appellant appears to have lost interest in pursuing the matter. ¶23