Dismissed¶27

Mohammad Sajjad v. Khurshida Bano

Chhattisgarh HC5 Feb 2026FA/118/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of civil first appeal; Section 96 CPC appeal conceded not maintainable due to bona fide confusion; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate forum; interim relief, if any, vacated. High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, FA No. 118 of 2023, decided 06/02/2026 by Bibhu Datta Guru, J. Parties: Mohammad Sajjad and Shafat Mohammad (appellants) versus Khurshida Bano and seven other respondents. Advocates: Hamida Siddique for appellants; Hari Agrawal for Respondent No. 1.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the appellants to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law; interim relief, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated. ¶27

Mohammad Sajjad Vs Khurshida Bano — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:6750

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

FA No. 118 of 2023

¶6

1 - Mohammad Sajjad S/o Haji Nazar Mohammad @ Bahadur Khan Aged About 51 Years R/o Chandamri, Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶7

RAHUL JHA

¶8

Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.02.06 16:10:39 +0530

¶9

2 - Shafat Mohammad S/o Haji Nagar Mohammad @ Bahadur Khan Aged About 50 Years R/o Muslim Ganj, Turkapara, Raigarh Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶10

Appellants

¶11

versus

¶12

1 - Khurshida Bano W/o Aashik Ali Aged About 52 Years R/o Turkapara Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶13

2 - Mu. Imtiyaz Bee W/o Hazi Nagar Mohammad Aged About 73 Years Turkapara, Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶14

3 - Jabbar Mohammad S/o Nazar Mohammad Aged About 43 Years Turkapara Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶15

4 - Abbas Mohammad S/o Nazar Mohammad Aged About 46 Years Turkapara Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶16

5 - Akbari W/o Lt. Gaffar Mohammad Aged About 34 Years R/o Turkapara Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶17

6 - Siraz S/o Lt. Gaffar Mohammad Aged About 19 Years R/o Turkapara, Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶18

7 - Raj S/o Lt. Gaffar Mohammad Aged About 18 Years R/o Turkapara Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶19

¶20

8 - Mohammad Rajjak S/o Nazar Mohammad Aged About 40 Years R/o Turkapara, Raigarh, Teh. And District Raigarh (C.G)

¶21

Respondent(s)

¶22

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶23

For Appellant(s) : Ms. Hamida Siddique, Advocate For Resp No.1 : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate

¶24

(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board

¶25

06/02/2026

¶26

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that owing to a bona fide confusion, the appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred before this Court, though the same is not maintainable. She, therefore, prays for permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.

¶27

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶28

The interim relief, if any, granted earlier stands vacated.

¶29

Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE

¶30

Rahul

Mohammad Sajjad v. Khurshida Bano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Sajjad v. Khurshida Bano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Chandani Dhritlahare (Suman) Vs Yashpal Singh Suman

Lalli Bai Vs Maha Singh

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs Sanil Khande

Radhe Shyam Uke Vs Syed Kazim Ali

Smt. Hemlata Patel Vs Vijay Kumar Patel

Dinesh Kumar Sharma Vs State of Chhattisgarh