Disposed¶29

Smt. Ranjeeta Mistri v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC14 Sept 2025WPS/9589/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur; WPS No. 9589 of 2025; disposed of as withdrawn on 15.09.2025 by Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas. Petitioner Smt. Ranjeeta Mistri sought continuation of service per order dated 13.06.2024 in WP(S) No. 1650 of 2013; respondents (State of Chhattisgarh, Secretaries, Directors, Collector DEO Dantewada, Municipal Council Bade Bacheli) rejected her representation vide order dated 10.09.2025. Withdrawal with liberty to challenge that order before appropriate forum. Counsel: Anirudha Shrivastava (petitioner); S.P. Kale, Additional Advocate General (State).

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge the respondents' order dated 10.09.2025 (rejecting her representation) before the appropriate forum; writ petition disposed of as withdrawn. ¶29

Smt. Ranjeeta Mistri Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:47090

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 9589 of 2025

¶6

1 - Smt. Ranjeeta Mistri W/o Shri Ashok Kumar Mistri Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No. 10, Bangali Camp, Near Old Market, Bacheli, District - Dantewada, C.G.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

¶10

2 - The Secretary The Department Of Urban Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

¶11

3 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

¶12

4 - The Director Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development, Indiravati Bhawan Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

¶13

5 - The Collector District- Dantewada, C.G.

¶14

6 - The District Education Officer District- Dantewada, C.G.

¶15

7 - The Municipal Council Bade Bacheli, District- Dantewada, C.G. (Through Its Chief Municipal Officer)

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr. Anirudha Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Mr. S.P. Kale, Additional Advocate General

¶18

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

¶19

Order on Board

¶20

15.09.2025

¶21

The petitioner has filed the present petition to direct the respondent

¶22

authorities to decide the claim of the petitioner as per the Hon’ble

¶23

Digitally signed by BHUMIKA BHUMIKA ANGARE ANGARE Date: 2025.09.16 11:35:49 +0530

¶24

¶25

Court’s order dated 13.06.2024 passed in WP(S) No. 1650 of 2013 and allow the petitioner to continue her service as she has been appointed as per the rules.

¶26

Learned counsel for the respondent would submit the respondents have considered and rejected the representation filed by the petitioner vide order dated 10.09.2025.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to challenge the order dated 10.09.2025 before appropriate forum.

¶28