Chamram Sinha Vs State of Chhattisgarh

2-That the Hon'ble court may kind enough to issue a writ/Writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions and to direct the respondents to comply the orders of this Hon'ble Court and to command the respondents to add the services rendered by the petitioners as daily wagers in the pensionable service.

¶24

3-That the Hon'ble Court may be kind enough to pass any appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case. ”

¶25

At the outset, learned counsel at the bar submit that the identical issue is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) Nos.86778678/2023. They also submit that the co-ordinate Bench of this Court while disposing of the bunch of writ petitions i.e. WPS No.10696/2019¹ and connected matters on 14.10.2024, which are identical to the present case categorically made observation at Para 6. Para 6 of the said order is reproduced hereunder for ready reference:-

¶26

"6. Accordingly, the bunch of these writ petitions (s) deserve to be disposed of with a direction that the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 8677-8678/2023 will be applicable mutatis mutandis in the facts and circumstances of the case of the petitioners and their entitlement to get additional pension will be governed by the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP ( C) No. 8677-8678/2023. It is also directed that if SLP (C) No. 867-8678 of 2023 is decided in favour of the

¶27

1 Bhagbali Kashyap Vs. State of CG and Ors and connected matters decided on 14.10.2024 {2024:CGHC:40132}

¶28

3

¶29

petitioners, the respondents shall extend the benefit to the petitioners without any further delay. It is also directed that if the grievance of the petitioners still exists, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file a fresh petition raising their grievances."

¶30

In view of such submission, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to dispose of this petition in terms of the aforesaid order.

¶31

Learned State counsel would not oppose the aforesaid submission.

¶32

Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and considering that identical issue is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and also considering the order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the aforesaid case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition in terms of order dated 14.10.2024 passed in WPS No.10696/2019. If aforesaid SLP No.8677-8678/2023 pending before the Hon'ble Supreme is decided in favour of the petitioner, the respondents shall extend benefit of the same to the petitioner without any further delay. Further, if grievance of the petitioner still exist, he shall be at liberty to raise his grievance in accordance with law.

¶33

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 14.10.2024 passed in WPS No.10696/2019 and other connected matters.

¶34

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

¶35

Sd/-

¶36

(Deepak Kumar Tiwari)

¶37

Judge

¶38

Avinash

Chamram Sinha v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chamram Sinha v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nand Kumar Jaiswal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajesh Kumar Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Standly Goodwin Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mary Jacinta Toppo Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Surja Devi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mukhtar Ahmed Ansari Vs State of Chhattisgarh