Disposed

Ravindra Kumar Mishra v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC5 Feb 2025WPS/1058/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A retired Assistant Director of Physical Education sought benefit of the 7th Pay Scale in pension, relying on an earlier batch decision of this Court in WPS No.4812/2024. The Court disposed of the petition on the same terms, directing respondent No.1 to decide the University Registrar's recommendation within 120 days.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in terms of WPS No.4812/2024; decision on Registrar's recommendation directed preferably within 120 days.

Ravindra Kumar Mishra Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2025)

2025:CGHC:6829

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 1058 of 2025

¶6

1 - Ravindra Kumar Mishra S/o Late Shri B.L. Mishra Aged About 64 Years Retired From The Post Of Assistant Director, Physical Education, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, R/o H-Ii, No.08, Sector-03, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶7

... Petitioner(s)

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner Higher Education, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

3 - Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Through Its Registrar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

... Respondent(s)

¶12

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Upadhyay, Advocate For State/Respondent(s) : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶15

Order on Board

¶16

06/02/2025

¶17

Heard Shri Manish Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer for the State and Shri Neeraj Choubey, learned counsel for respondent No.3.

¶18

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical petitions have been decided by this Court on 16/12/2024

¶19

¶20

in a batch of petitions leading case bearing WPS No.4812/2024, as such this petition can be disposed of in the terms of the order passed in aforesaid petition to which the learned counsel for the respondents have not disputed.

¶21

In WPS No.4812/2024 this Court after appreciating the submission made by the respective parties disposed of the said writ petition along with other connected matters by observing thus:-

¶22

“Taking into consideration the submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, these petitions at this juncture are disposed of directing respondent No.1 to take decision on recommendation made by respondent No.3/Registrar of the University dated 15/05/2023 with respect to granting benefit of 7th Pay Scale in pension payable to the petitioners, preferably within a period 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The authority concerned is also directed to keep in mind the judgment passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(S) No.196/2011, parties being Santosh Kumar Upadhyay 3 & Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others.”

¶23

In view of the above, present petition is also disposed of in terms of the order passed in WPS No.4812/2024 and other connected matters.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

SHAYNA KADRI Digitally signed bySHAYNA KADRI

¶26

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶27

Shayna

Ravindra Kumar Mishra v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Kumar Mishra v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkamal Kore Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Jaideep Jha Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jyoti Thakur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bilson Kumar Kujur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Meenakshi Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rambandan Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh