Allowed¶25

M/S Landmark Engineer v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC11 Jun 2025MCC/529/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; MCC No. 529 of 2025; condonation of delay of 71 days; Section 05 Limitation Act 1963; restoration application; CR-6-2019; dismissal for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 04.02.2025; restoration subject to cost of Rs.2,000/-; Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Committee; automatic dissolution of order on non-payment; Sanjay K. Agrawal; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the 71-day delay (IA No.01 allowed) and restoration of CR-6-2019 to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law, subject to payment of Rs.2,000/- cost to the Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Committee within 15 days, failing which the order automatically dissolves. ¶25

M/S Landmark Engineer Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Page No.1 of 2 IN MCC-529-2025

¶2

2025:CGHC:23403

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

MCC No. 529 of 2025

¶6

SAIFAN KHAN

¶7

1 - M/s Landmark Engineer Through The Proprietor Nishant Jain, S/o Shri Suresh Chandra Jain, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Siddh Digitally Shikhar Apartment, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. signed by SAIFAN KHANDate: ... Applicant 2025.06.1217:32:03 Versus +0530

¶8

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶9

2 - The Executive Engineer Public Works Department Khairagarh Division District Khairagarh Chuikhadan-Gandai Chhattisgarh.

¶10

... Non-applicant

¶11

[Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)]

¶12

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. Brajendra Singh, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶13

Order on Board

¶14

12. 06.2025

¶15

1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an application filed under Section 05 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 71 days in filing the present restoration application (MCC).

¶16

2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, I am of considered opinion that the applicant has shown sufficient cause in filing this restoration application (MCC) with a delay of 71 days and, accordingly, the same is liable to be condoned.

¶17

Page No.2 of 2 IN MCC-529-2025

¶18

3. Consequently, the delay of 71 days in filing this restoration application (MCC) is hereby condoned. IA No.01 is allowed .

¶19

4. Also heard on admission.

¶20

5. The application being arguable is admitted for hearing.

¶21

6. Issue notice to the non-applicant. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the non-applicant accepts notice.

¶22

7. With the consent of the parties, heard finally.

¶23

8. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of CR-6-2019, which was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 04.02.2025.

¶24

9. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. CR-6-2019 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand Only) before the Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Committee and file poof thereof within 15 days from today. It is made clear that failure to deposit amount of cost by the applicant within stipulated time, will lead to automatic dissolution of this order.

¶25

10. Accordingly, the MCC allowed .

¶26

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶27

s@if

M/S Landmark Engineer v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Landmark Engineer v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jatashankar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Nilesh Kumar Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Abdul Naim Khan Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ku. Sarita Mishra Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ranu Sinha Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

General Manager (Mp) Vs Vikrant Kumar Lal