Allowed¶23

Rukhmani Bai Verma v. Bharat Lal

Chhattisgarh HC7 Jan 2025MCC/39/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration of appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; recall of dismissal order dated 21.08.2019; SA No. 31 of 2007 restored to its original number; MCC No. 39 of 2023; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal; decided 08.01.2025; Rukhmani Bai Verma and others (petitioners) versus Bharat Lal and State of Chhattisgarh (respondents); counsel: B.L. Dewangan for petitioners, Amit Buxy (Panel Lawyer) for State; no statute or precedent cited in the order.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of SA No. 31 of 2007 to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law, upon recall of the order dated 21.08.2019. ¶23

Rukhmani Bai Verma Vs Bharat Lal — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Page No.1 of 2

2025:CGHC:1224

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

MCC No. 39 of 2023

¶6

Digitally signed by SAIFAN SAIFAN KHAN KHAN Date:2025.01.09 16:16:05 +0530

¶7

1 - Rukhmani Bai Verma Wd/o Ram Gopal Verma Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Latuwa, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶8

2 - Manakchand Verma S/o Ram Gopal Verma Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Latuwa, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶9

3 - Mahendra Kumar Verma S/o Ram Gopal Verma Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Latuwa, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶10

4 - Anil Kumar Verma S/o Ram Gopal Verma Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Latuwa, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶11

5 - Ram Kumar Verma S/o Ram Gopal Verma Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Latuwa, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶12

... Petitioner(s)

¶13

versus

¶14

1 - Bharat Lal S/o Ghondul Verma Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Lathuwa, Tahsil Balodabazar, District Raipur Now BalodabazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶15

2 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶16

... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Petitioner : Mr. B.L. Dewangan, Advocate
For Respondent No.01 : None.
For Respondent No.02 : Mr. Amit Buxy, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

¶17

SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Page No.2 of 2

Order On Board

08. 01.2025

1. Heard.

2. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of SA No.31 of 2007 which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 21.08.2019.

¶23

3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Order dated 21.08.2019 is hereby recalled. SA No.31 of 2007 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law.

¶24

4. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed .

¶25

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶26

s@if

Rukhmani Bai Verma v. Bharat Lal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rukhmani Bai Verma v. Bharat Lal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishan Lal Nishad Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Pankaj Sahu Vs Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit

Dr. Govind Prasad Tiwari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

S. D. Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Snehaprabha Vs Smt. Kamla Bai

Ghasin Bai Vs Madanlal Goyanka