Ghasin Bai v. Madanlal Goyanka
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; MCC No. 353 of 2020; decided 08.01.2025 by Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (SB). Restoration of SA No. 23 of 2009, dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 16.03.2020. Condonation of delay under Section 5 Limitation Act (IA No.03 & IA No.06); abatement set aside under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC (IA No.02 & IA No.05); substitution of LRs under Order 22 Rules 4 & 3 CPC (IA No.01 & IA No.04); deaths/deletions per CO dt. 08.01.2025. Parties: petitioners Ghasin Bai (dec.), Bisnath Bhariya, Punnulal Bhariya, Dasaru Bhariya, Tijju (dec.), Maiki Bai, Kunwar Lal, Gumanu Prasad, Reva Prasad, Marhu, Kartik; respondents Madanlal Goyanka (dec.), Dr. Sitaram Goyanka, Ramjilal Goyanka. Counsel: Aditya Khare for petitioners.
What did the court decide?
Delay condoned; abatement set aside; LRs of deceased non-applicant No.1 and of deceased applicants No.1 & 2A brought on record; SA No. 23 of 2009 restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law.