Allowed¶33

Snehaprabha v. Smt. Kamla Bai

Chhattisgarh HC7 Jan 2025MCC/312/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; MCC No. 312 of 2020; restoration of second appeal SA No.314 of 2001 dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 18.03.2019; condonation of delay (IA No.01); petitioners Snehaprabha and others vs Kamla Bai and others incl. State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Rajnandgaon; Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.; order dated 08.01.2025; MCC allowed.

What did the court decide?

Delay in filing MCC No. 312 of 2020 condoned, and SA No.314 of 2001 restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. ¶33

Snehaprabha Vs Smt. Kamla Bai — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Page No.1 of 2

2025:CGHC:1225

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

MCC No. 312 of 2020

¶6

Digitally signed by SAIFAN SAIFAN KHAN KHAN Date:2025.01.09 16:16:08 +0530

¶7

1 - Snehaprabha Widow Of Mohan Singh Aged About 78 Years R/o Village Mahroom, Tah. And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, At Present Residing At B-6, Rukmini Apartment Ambika Nagar, Amrawati, M.H., 444604

¶8

2 - Darshana Kumari D/o Late Mohan Singh Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Mahroom, Tah. And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, At Present Residing At B-6, Rukmini Apartment Ambika Nagar, Amrawati, M.H., 444604

¶9

3 - Saket Singh S/o Late Mohan Singh Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Mahroom, Tah. And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, At Present Residing At B-6, Rukmini Apartment Ambika Nagar, Amrawati, M.H., 444604

¶10

4 - Vishal Singh Alias Kishore Singh S/o Late Mohan Singh Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Mahroom, Tah. And District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, At Present Residing At B-6, Rukmini Apartment Ambika Nagar, Amrawati, M.H., 444604

¶11

... Petitioner(s)

¶12

versus

¶13

1 - Smt. Kamla Bai W/o Bahadur Singh Chouhan Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Kodwa, Tah And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶14

2 - Late Sushil Bai W/o Munendra Aged About 60 Years Through Lr's

¶15

2.1 - 2.(I) Jay Singh S/o Munendrasingh Chauhan R/o Badgaon, PostPala, Tah. Kirnapur, District Balaghat, M.P.

¶16

2.2 - 2(Ii )vijay Singh S/o Munendrasingh Chauhan R/o Badgaon, PostPala, Tah. Kirnapur, District Balaghat, M.P.

¶17

2.3 - 2(Iii) Smt. Geeta Munendrasingh Chauhan Nil

¶18

2.4 - 2(Iv) Smt. Sarla Munendrasingh Chauhan C/o Jaysingh Chauhan Badgaon, Tq. Kirnapur.

¶19

3 - Smt. Shakun Bai W/o Arjun Singh Aged About 50 Years R/o Katiyapara, Juna Bilaspur, Distt. And Tah.- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶20

Page No.2 of 2

¶21

4 - Arjun Singh S/o Vijay Singh Thakur Aged About 52 Years R/o Katiyapara, Juna, Distt. And Teh.- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶22

5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh), District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

¶23

... Respondent(s)

¶24

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶25

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr. Parth Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent No.03 & 04 : Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No.05 : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer

¶26

SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

¶27

08. 01.2025

¶28

1. Heard on IA No.01, which are application seeking condonation of delay in filing this MCC.

¶29

2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same are allowed. Delay in filing this MCC is hereby condoned.

¶30

3. Also heard on main application for restoration.

¶31

4. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of SA No.314 of 2001 which was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 18.03.2019.

¶32

5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. SA No.314 of 2001 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law.

¶33

6. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed .

¶34

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶35

s@if

Snehaprabha v. Smt. Kamla Bai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Snehaprabha v. Smt. Kamla Bai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishan Lal Nishad Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Pankaj Sahu Vs Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit

Dr. Govind Prasad Tiwari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

S. D. Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rukhmani Bai Verma Vs Bharat Lal

Ghasin Bai Vs Madanlal Goyanka