Krishna Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging a selection process was not pressed; counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ petition challenging a selection process was not pressed; counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No.58 of 2024
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause-title, as taken from CIS system)
For Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Shailja Shukla, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
Order On Board
07/02/2024
petitioner wants to withdraw the instant writ petition.
Sd/-
( Arvind Singh Chandel )
Judge
Abhigya.S
Krishna Kumar
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Law And Legislative Department
The District And Sessions Judge Balrampur
The Selection Committee, District And Sessions Judge, Balrampur, Through Its Chairperson
Chhotelal Patel
Deepak Kumar Nishad
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court