Writ petition concerning land acquisition dismissed as counsel for the petitioner pleaded no instructions; liberty reserved to seek revival if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 494 of 2015
Versus
| For Petitioner |
: Shri Manoharlal Sahu, Advocate |
|---|---|
| holding the brief of Ms. Priya Mishra, | |
| Advocate. | |
| For Respondent/ State | : Ms. Prabha Sharma, P.L. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
11.06.2024
2
would be at liberty to move an application for resurrection of the petition, if cause of action still survives.
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Nimmi
Omprakash Dansena
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Industrial And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Rajdhani, P.S. Rakhi, Tahsil And District- Raipu
The Collector, Raigarh
The Sub Divisional Officer And Land Acquisition Officer, Kharsiya
The Tahsildar, Kharsiya
The Db Power Limited, Bandadara, District Janjgir-Champa, Through The Managing Director
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
