Disposed

Ramnath Gond v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC4 Mar 2024WPS/1404/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioners' claim for leave encashment as a retired government servant, following the precedent set in Faguvaram Patel (WPS-3870 of 2021). The decision was made within three months of the order's production.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider claim for grant of leave encashment within three months in light of order in WPS-3870 of 2021.

Ramnath Gond Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2024)

¶1

Page 1 of 2

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 1404 of 2024

¶5

Ramnath Gond S/o Late Dhirajram Gond Aged About 63 Years R/o Village- Asnind, Post- Hataud, Tahsil- Kasdol, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- PETITIONER

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

The Chief Engineer Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

The Executive Engineer Water Resources Division, Kasdol, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

¶11

The Joint Director Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

--------RESPONDENTS

¶13

__________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner : Mr. KP Sahu, Advocate. For the Respondent/State : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. AG

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board

¶15

05/03/2024

¶16

Grievance raised by petitioners in this writ petition is that petitioners though stood retired as Government servants but Respondentauthorities not gave benefit of leave encashment.

¶17

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that identical issue came up for consideration before this Court in batch of writ petitions lead case being WPS-3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh) came to be allowed vide order dated 30.09.2022, wherein Court directed to grant leave encashment and

¶18

Page 2 of 2

¶19

surrender leave to petitioners within specified time and he prays for similar relief in this case also.

¶20

Learned State counsel submits that claim of petitioners will also be considered in light of order passed in Faguvaram Patel (supra), in accordance with law.

¶21

Considering the submission of learned counsel for petitioners as also the State counsel based on decision in WPS-3870 of 2021, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents-authorities to consider the claim of petitioners for grant of leave encashment in the light of order passed in WPS-3870 of 2021 on 30.09.2022, within a period of three months from the date of production of copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and supporting documents.

¶22

With the aforesaid observation and direction, writ petition finally stands disposed of.

¶23

Certified copy as per rules.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge

¶26

Santosh

Ramnath Gond v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramnath Gond v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrashekhar Vs Pramod Kumar

Kitesh Mayani Vs General Manager (H R M) Bank of Baroda

Kripa Shankar Dubey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Hemlata Khunte Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chandan Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kusum Kanti Tirkey Vs State of Chhattisgarh