Petitioner-Forester challenged transfer order via writ petition. Court observed transfer was administrative convenience and notifiable only by State Govt. for gazette posts. Rejecting grounds of frequent transfer, petition dismissed.
Writ petition disposed of; no interference with impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 1278 of 2024
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioners : Ms. Shrijita Kesharwani, Advocate For State : Mr. Suyash Dhar, Dy. Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
06.03.2024
Page 2 of 2
of Dhamtari.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge
Manish
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer order of a ranger gazetted post issued by the Divisional Forest Officer is sustainable.
Harish Kumar Dewangan
State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department pf Forest Mahanadi Bhawan Atalnagar Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
