Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue alternate efficacy under the Employees Provident Funds Act. Court granted the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed with liberty to avail alternate efficacious remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No.946/2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Dr. Saurabh K Pande, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate
SB:Hon’ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board
19/07/2024
2
to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail alternate efficacious remedy available under the law.
with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
roshan/-
Sail Refractory Unit
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner And Recovery Officer Employees Provident Fund Organization
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
