Dismissed¶27

Satwan Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Jul 2024WPC/483/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Satwan Verma & others v. State of Chhattisgarh & others - WPC No. 483 of 2021, High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, S.B. (Parth Prateem Sahu, J.), order dated 18/07/2024: writ petition dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner counsel's request following subsequent development and orders by other revenue officials; no merits adjudicated; no statutes or precedents cited; marked NAFR.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner. ¶27

Satwan Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPC No. 483 of 2021

¶5

Satwan Verma S/o Late Shri Bisnath, Aged About 37 Years

¶6

Santosh Verma S/o Late Shri Bisnath, Aged About 31 Years

¶7

Birsingh Verma S/o Late Shri Bisnath, Aged About 29 Years Applicants No. 1 to 3 are R/o Village Hathmudi, Tahsil And P.S. Bemetra, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh

¶8

Sukrita D/o Late Shri Bisnath W/o Shri Manoj Verma, Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Chouranga, P.S. Simga, District Baloda Bazar C.G.

¶9

Sukhmani D/o Late Shri Bisnath W/o Shri Kanhaiya Verma, Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Bera, District Bemetara C.G.

¶10

---- Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

Tahsildar Tahsil Bemetara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh

¶14

Khemraj S/o Shri Birbal Singh Aged About 45 Years

¶15

Sohan S/o Shri Birbal Singh Aged About 50 Years

¶16

Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Dholu Verma Aged About 43 Years

¶17

Kumar Das S/o Shri Daya Das Aged About 35 Year

¶18

Respondents No. 3 to 6 are Residents Of Village Hathmudi, Tah. Bemetara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh

¶19

Janak Bai W/o Bisnath Verma Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Hathmudi, Tah. Bemetara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh

¶20

---- Respondents

¶21

For Petitioner	: Ms. Nikita Rai, Advocate on behalf of
	Ms. Meena Shastri, Advocate
For State	: Mr. Swajit Ubeja, Panel Lawyer
For Res. No. 3 to 6	: Mr. Atul Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate

¶22

¶23

S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge

¶24

Order On Board

¶25

18/07/2024

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of subsequent development and the order passed by the other revenue officials, she may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition.

¶27

In view of submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

Sd/--/---/-/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge

¶29

Praveen

Satwan Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satwan Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan Dhruv Vs Government of India

Dashrath Kunjam Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Ramji Singh Ravi @ Ramkumar Ravi Vs Assistant Engineer, Cspdcl

Smt. Savita Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chandrashekhar Vaishnav Vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited

Janman Utthan Samiti Balco Nagar Korba Vs State of Chhattisgarh