the case was fixed for hearing on 02.08.2019. During proceeding of hearing, respondent No.2 to 6 submitted their written objections on application for grant of stage carriage permit submitted by respondent No.1. The RTA upon hearing applicant, objectors dismissed the application observing that, if the stage carriage permit is granted with proposed time schedule it may lead to situation of dispute, short time interval of bus operated by applicant and the objectors may have chances of dispute and quarrel and it may lead to unhealthy competition. The order passed by the RTA, Raipur was put to challenge in an appeal before the STAT and the Appellate Tribunal upon considering the submission made by learned counsel for respective parties as also taking note of the decision in case of Mithilesh Garg Vs. Union of India, reported in AIR 1992 SC 443, in Jagdip Singh Vs. Jagir Chand & Anr. reported in (2001) 8 SCC 437 and in case of Manish Travels Vs. Regional Transport Authority, reported in 2018 SCC OnLine Chh 684, allowed the appeal in part, remitted back the matter to the RTA with the direction (i) After hearing the applicant/appellant under the second proviso of Section 80(2) of the Act, if change/amendment of the proposed time cycle is necessary and required under Section 71(2) of the Act, grant opportunity to applicant/appellant to submit amended time table and according to the amended time table to be submitted by applicant/appellant, regional stage carriage permit be issued within a period of 30 days, (ii)
