Writ petition withdrawn at the petitioner's request before any adjudication, with liberty to take recourse to law. The court decided nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 3388 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause Title taken from Case Information System)
| For Petitioner | : Mr. Baddruddin Khan, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Res./State | : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer |
| For Res. No. 2 | : Mr. Vibhor Goverdhan, learned Advocate holding brief of Mr. Anoop Majoomdar, learned Advocate |
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
19.03.2024
“10.1 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioners.
10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly further be pleased to direct to the respondents No. 1 for giving punishment to the respondent No. 2 for tempering with the government document after necessary enquiry.
10.3. Cost of the petition may also be granted.”
2
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
amita
Subhash Rai
The Principal Secretary (PWD)
S. Vhi. Pedegaonkar
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
