Dismissed¶20

Vedprakash Kurre v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC18 Mar 2024WPC/189/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; permission to withdraw granted at the outset; petition dismissed as withdrawn; High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur; WPC No. 189 of 2024; decided 19.03.2024 by Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J.; petitioners Vedprakash Kurre, Kamaldev Kurre, Ramkrishna Kurre and Sitaram Khute of Vill. Khuduhata, Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.); respondents include State of Chhattisgarh, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Upper Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Additional Collector and SDO (R) Sarangarh, and Smt. Meena Khute, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Khuduhata; no merits adjudicated, no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no objection from the other side. ¶20

Vedprakash Kurre Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

WPC No. 189 of 2024

¶4

1. Vedprakash Kurre S/o Shri Jethuram Aged About 35 Years R/o Vill Khuduhata Sarangarh Dist. Sarangarh, Bilaigarh (C.G.)

¶5

2. Kamaldev Kurre S/o Shri Premlal Kurre Aged About 40 Years R/o Vill Khuduhata Sarangarh Dist. Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

¶6

3. Ramkrishna Kurre S/o Hariram Kurre Aged About 50 Years R/o Vill Khuduhata Sarangarh Dist. Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

¶7

4. Sitaram Khute S/o Alekha Khute Aged About 50 Years R/o Vill Khuduhata Sarangarh Dist. Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.) ---- Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

2. Upper Commissioner Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶11

3. Additional Collector Sarangarh District Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

¶12

4. Sub Divisional Officer (R) Sarangarh District Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

¶13

5. Smt. Meena Khute W/o Shri Dilip Khunte @ Dilip Kumar Khunte Aged About 37 Years Sarpach Gram Panchayat Khuduhata, R/o Vill. Khudubhata, Block Sarangarh District Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.) ---- Respondents

¶14

(Cause-title is taken from Case Information System)

¶15

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioners : Mr. Syed Jayed Ziya Ali, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Syed Ishhadil Ali, Advocate.
For State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P. L.
For respondent no. 5 : Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board

¶16

19.03.2024

¶17

1. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition.

¶18

2. Permission granted.

¶19

3. No objection from other side.

¶20

4. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶21

Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶22

Ajinkya

Vedprakash Kurre v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vedprakash Kurre v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bonny Singh Saggu Vs Union of India

Ms Scania Steel and Power Ltd. Vs State Bank of India

Jageshwar Pahadi Korwa Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Phool Komre Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Subhash Rai (Proprietor of the Partner M/S Devanshi Construction) Vs the Principal Secretary (Pwd)

Dhan Kumari Vs Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)