Writ petition by six villagers against the State and a company was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file a duly constituted petition; dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to file a duly constituted petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 2614 of 2017
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
2
For Petitioners :- Mr. Harsh Verma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rahul Agrawal, Advocate . For State-respondents :- Mr. Gagan Tiwari, Deputy Govt Advocate . For Respondent No.4 :- None.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board
05-01-2024
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge
Aadil
Girvar S/o Balak Yadav
Buti S/o Dhani
Lachhan Manjhi, S/o Dhani
Goutiya S/o Tahlu
Hari S/o Banu Manjhi
Sayani D/o Dharam Sai
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
