Respondent No.3 also submitted objection mentioning that the time which was sought for in the application submitted under Section 72 of the Act of 1988 by respondent No.1, is just before the departure of his bus from Gadhwa Road to Ambikapur. It was also pleaded that, if respondent No.1 changes his time, he is having no objection. Similar objection is also raised by respondent No.4. The RTA upon hearing applicant, objectors dismissed the application observing, if the stage carriage permit is granted with proposed time schedule it may lead to situation of dispute, short time interval of bus operated by applicant and the objector may have chances of dispute and quarrel and it may lead to unhealthy competition. The order passed by the RTA, Raipur was put to challenge in an appeal before the STAT and the Appellate Tribunal upon considering the submission made by learned counsel for respective parties as also taking note of the decision in case of Mithilesh Garg Vs. Union of India, reported in AIR 1992 SC 443, in Jagdip Singh Vs. Jagir Chand & Anr. reported in (2001) 8 SCC 437 and in case of Manish Travels Vs. Regional Transport Authority, reported in 2018 SCC OnLine Chh 684, allowed the appeal in part, remitted back the matter to the RTA with the direction (i) to grant opportunity to appellant/applicant to submit amended time table and according to the amended time table to be submitted by applicant/appellant, inter state stage carriage permit be issued within a period of 30 days, (ii) It is not