In a review petition, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action had come to an end and the petition had become infructuous. Accepting this statement on record, the High Court dismissed the review petition as having rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 (REVP No. 58 of 2024)
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR REVP No. 58 of 2024
Ashok Yadav S/o Late Shri Chhotelal Yadav, Aged About 61 Years R/o Village- Hamalpara, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandagon (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause title taken from the Case Information System)
For Petitioner :- Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Counsel For Respondent :- Mr. Ashwin Panickar, Counsel
Division Bench
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Order on Board
(05.04.2024)
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
2
(REVP No. 58 of 2024)
submits that the cause of action has come to an end and therefore, the petition has become infructuous.
Sd/Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal ) Judge Judge
@d!t!
Ashok Yadav
Smt. Mohani Sankhala
Satish Kumar Sankhala
Sudhir Kumar Sankhala
Sachin Kumar Sankhala
Mangilal Sankhala
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Radhakishan Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
