lodged FIR (Ex.P/08) and reported the matter to the police. Further, the victim (PW-11) was also subjected to some length of crossexamination, but she remain consistent in her version and, therefore, her testimony appears to be reliable and inspire confidence. The said stand of the victim (PW-11) is also in confirmity with other evidence available on record i.e. (i) MLC report of the victim (Ex.P/12A), wherein it has clearly been mentioned that internal injuries were present on the body of the victim (PW-11), redness was also found, her hymen was also red and slightly torn and blood was also oozing out and, as such, she has been subjected to attempt to rape (sexual assault), which is duly supported by the statement of Dr. Kamni Ray (PW-09), who has medically examined the victim (PW-11) and (iii) FSL report (Ex.P/21), wherein it has mentioned that stains of human sperm/semen were only found on victim’s slide and frock as also on the undergarment of the appellant. As such, on the basis of aforesaid evidence available on record, the finding recorded by the learned trial Court that the appellant is guilty of having committed sexual assault on the minor victim (PW-11), is strictly in accordance with law. We do not find any illegality or perversity in findings recorded by the learned trial Court. Accordingly, we hereby affirm the said finding.
