Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition after arguing for some time, with liberty to file a fresh better constituted petition. Respondent raised no objection. The Court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition, directing return of the certified copy of the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 161 of 2024
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Singhal, Advocate. For Respondent : Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pande, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Order On Board
18.01.2024
Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge
Deepti Jha
Anil Dammani
Directorate Of Enforcement, Government Of India
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
