The High Court of Chhattisgarh condoned the delay in filing an M.C.C. seeking restoration of a First Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution, citing the COVID-19 lockdown and Supreme Court directions. The M.C.C. was allowed and the appeal was restored to its original number.
M.C.C. allowed; delay condoned; First Appeal No. 186 of 2019 restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.C.C. No. 565 of 2020
---- Applicants/Plaintiffs
Versus
----Respondents
For Applicants : Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 to 3 : None present. For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Rajendra Patel, Advocate. For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Rajendra Patel, Adv. on behalf of
Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate.
2
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Order On Board
17.01.2024
3
Sd/(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge
Amit/-
4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the Main Civil Conclusion (M.C.C.) for restoration should be condoned due to the COVID-19 pandemic?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Supreme Court Suo Motu Writ PetitionReferred¶30
Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3/2020
Smt. Usha Badade
Smt. Veena Jadhav
Smt. Rashmi Shinde
Dhirendra Rao Jaachak
Smt. Urmila Jaachak
Smt. Alka Jaachak
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
