Writ petition regarding employment/service. Petitioner stated no instructions were received and filed that he was not interested in prosecuting the petition. Court dismissed the petition on these grounds.
Petition dismissed as the petitioner filed that he was not interested in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No. 3260 of 2009
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Aman Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate.
Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order On Board
14/08/2023
SPC issued to the petitioner has returned unserved. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in this matter.
Sd/ (Rajani Dubey) Judge
Khan
Braj Kishore Singh
1. State Bank of India, Central Recruitment & Promotion Department
2. Assistant General Manager (HR), Recruitment Cell, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal
3. Assistant General Manager (Administration)/Chief Manager (HR), State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Byron Bazar, Raipur
4. Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Collectorate Branch, Bilaspur
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
