Vinod Kumar Singh v. Coal India Ltd.and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition seeking promotion and consequential benefits after finding the petitioner disinterested due to the efflux of time.
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition seeking promotion and consequential benefits after finding the petitioner disinterested due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 2690 of 2009
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Aman Pandey, Advocate. For respondents : Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Order On Board
14/08/2023
“10.1 It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records concerning decision on petitioner’s representation and causes for delay in completion of enquiry from the case of the petitioner from the possession of the respondents for its kind perusl.
10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari quashing and setting aside impugned communication and decision to reject petitioner’s representation, by declaring the same to be illegal and inoperative, being violative of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India.
10.3 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ in the nature mandamus commanding the respondents to give effect to the promotion of the petitioner as Chief Engineer with effect from 05.03.2005 and place him in the seniority list of chief engineer over and above his juniors and also grant all consequential benefits of pay and perks.
10.4 Any other relief/reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may think fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, with cost of the petition may also please be granted to the petitioners.”
3 . Mr. Aman Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner pleads no instruction.
Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) JUDGE
pkd
Vinod Kumar Singh
Coal India Limited
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court