The petition was dismissed as infructuous on the grounds that the grievance raised by the petitioner had already been considered by the State/respondents and was no longer viable. No substantive legal issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 1869 of 2023
Mahendra, S/o Janak, Aged About 39 Years R/o Near Kendriya Vidyalaya, Mahavir Park Colony, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh Permanent Address - House No. 192, Ward No. 02, Sasholi, Tehsil -Tilda, District Raipur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate. For State : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board
13/04/2023
Page 2 of 2
already been considered by the State/respondents, therefore, this petition has become infructuous, as such, on being mentioned, this case is listed today before this Court.
Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Arun
Mahendra
State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education
State Of Chhattisgarh Though Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department
Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction
Joint Director Directorate Of Public Instruction
The Controller Legal Metrology
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
