The High Court at Bilaspur dismissed an appeal against a judgment decreeing a counterclaim for vacant possession. The appellant's claim for title based on an alleged oral sale was rejected as unproven, and no substantial legal question arose to overturn the lower courts' findings.
The appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SA No.105 of 2014
---- Appellant/Plaintiff
Versus
---- Respondents
Present:-
Shri Parag Kotecha appears along with Shri Alok Tiwari, counsel for the appellant. Shri Ravipal Maheshwari, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.3.
Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal
Order On Board
08/05/2023
Heard on admission.
2
A/2011, has dismissed the plaintiff’s claim.
3
therefore, it cannot be said that the property in question was purchased by the plaintiff from his said brother i.e. Jagdalla.
No orders as to cost.
SD/(Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge
Tumane
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the lower appellate court committed any illegality in dismissing the plaintiff's claim for declaration of title and confirmation of possession.
Whether the appeal raises any substantial question of law regarding the alleged oral sale of the property.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jatiram S/o Dukhva Kahra
Jethuram S/o Maniram
Budlu S/o Badku
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay S. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
