Parasram v. Vijay Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal as it had abated, noting that the sole respondent died and no application was filed to implead his legal representatives.
What the court decided
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MA No. 49 of 2018
- Parasram S/o Firturam Kewat Aged About 60 Years Occupation Labour, R/o Ward No.3, Thana And Tahsil Sakti, District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh (Plaintiff), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
---- Appellant
Versus
- Vijay Kumar S/o Roopchand Agrawal Aged About 25 Years Sahukar, Bishnu Service Center, R/o Ward No.6, Tahsil And Thana Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (Defendant), District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh
---Respondent
________________________________________________________ For the Appellant : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Adv.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal Order on Board
06.05.2023
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed on account of death of the respondent without filing an application to implead legal representatives.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Parasram S/o Firturam Kewat
- respondent
Vijay Kumar S/o Roopchand Agrawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- MA/49/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court