In a contempt petition, the respondent appeared stating they had been transferred from the relevant district before the prior writ order. The court found the respondent could not have complied with the dated order and disposed of the present contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CONT No. 353 of 2021
Devashish Rai S/o Dinobandhu Rai, Aged About 42 Years R/o P.V.-116, Pakhanjur, New Market Ward No.15, Ambedkar Ward, Post Office- Pakhanjur, District- North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
G.S. Thakur Posted as Food Officer, District- North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh
| ---- Respondent | |
|---|---|
| 10/02/2023 | Mr. D. N. Prajapati, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Roy, on behalf of Mr. Shashank Thakur, counsel for the respondent. |
| Respondents upon entering appearance have submitted that respondent herein had been transferred from the said place even before the writ petition was disposed of i.e. on 06.01.2019 whereas, the order passed by this Court on 03.12.2019, as such the order under any circumstances could not had been complied with by the present respondent. In view of the same, the present contempt petition at this juncture stands disposed of. Reserving the right of the petitioner to avail such other remedies available to him. |
|
| Rohit | Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge |
Devashish Rai
G.S. Thakur
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
