The High Court of Chhattisgarh, in a one-line order, disposed of a contempt petition (Cont. No. 161 of 2022) without reasons because the petitioner submitted that the impugned order had been complied with while reserving rights.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CONT No. 161 of 2022
1. Bhavesh Verma S/o Shri Ishwar Dayal Verma Aged About 26 Years Occupation Service, Posted As Technician At District Hospital Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh, R/o Ward No. 17, Mungeli, P.S. And Tehsil Mungeli District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
09.02.2023
Mr. Surfaraj Khan Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate for Respondents. Counsel for parties submits that the order has since been complied with. Accordingly, the present Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
However, right of the petitioner stands reserved to assail the subsequent development afresh, if he so wants.
Sd/-
P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE
J.
Bhavesh Verma
Dr. Priyanka Shukla
Trilokinath Mahilengeshwar
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
