The High Court of Chhattisgarh, in Acquittal Appeal No. 100 of 2012, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the appellant for non-appearance and want of prosecution.
The criminal revision (acquittal appeal) is dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Acquittal Appeal No. 100 of 2012
Puneshwar Chandra, Age 55 years, S/o Achcheram Chandra, r/o Balpur, P.S. Sarsiwa, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
---- Appellant
Versus
All of them r/o Balpur, P.S. Sarsiwa, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
---- Respondents
For Appellant : None present. For Respondents : None present
Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Chandravanshi
Order On Board
08.09.2023
(1) Even after the matter was called out for hearing several times, none appeared for the appellant nor represented through counsel, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the criminal revision for want of prosecution.
(2) Accordingly, the acquittal appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(N.K.Chandravanshi) Judge
Amit/-
2
3
Puneshwar Chandra
Samudro
Khemraj
Pankaj Chandra
Manikdas
N.K. Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
