The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous since the claim had already been rejected and challenged in a subsequent writ petition pending adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No. 691 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
| 10/05/2022 | Mr. Prabhat Kumar Saxena, Advocate for the petitioner . |
|---|---|
| Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate for the respondents. Learned counsel for the parties admit the fact that pending the writ petition the respondents have decided the claim of the petitioner and the claim has since been rejected and the rejection has subsequently been challenged in a subsequent writ petition, hence the present writ petition as such has become infructuous. In the light of submissions made by the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge |
Ved
Smt. Preeti Borkar (Kathane) D/o Late Shri M. R. Borkar
Food Corporation Of India Through Its Managing Director Dattapada Road, Rajendra Nagar, New Building Borivali East, Mumbai- 66
The Deputy General Manager (Personnel) Food Corporation Of India
The Assistant General Manager (Personnel) Food Corporation Of India
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
