A writ petition challenging a substantive grievance was disposed off as infructuous because the grievance had been redressed by the respondents, although the petitioner was permitted to claim interest.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous; petitioner permitted to claim interest separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No. 1828 of 2022
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
09/05/2022 Mr. Pravin Kumar Tulsyan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate for the respondent No.4. The counsel for the parties submits that the substantive grievance of the petitioner has since been redressed with and therefore they do not intend to pursue the writ petition as of now. However, the counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to pursue her claim for interest with the
respondents, which the respondents may consider in accordance with Rules. As prayed for, the writ petition as of now stands disposed of as having become infructuous reserving the right of the petitioner to approach the respondents claiming for interest, if at all if she so wants. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Ved
Smt. Dulari Nag Wd/o Sampat Singh Nag
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Education
Collector
Treasurer Officer
Branch Manager, State Bank Of India
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
