Inder Premchandani v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No.…
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 2068 of 2022
Inder Premchandani Versus State Bank Of India
| 22.06.2022 | Shri Rishabh Bajaj, on behalf of Shri Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Counsel for the Petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Counsel for the Respondents-SBI. | |
| Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has since become infructuous. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. |
|
| Sd/- | |
| (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE |
J.
Inder Premchandani
State Bank Of India
Vivek Kumar Agrawal
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court