The High Court dismissed the writ petition by directing the Additional Commissioner to decide the revision petition within 60 days and maintained the petitioner's status as Sarpanch.
Writ petition dismissed; Additional Commissioner directed to decide revision petition within 60 days; status quo regarding post of Sarpanch maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 1731 of 2022
Versus
10. Sushil Sidar, S/o Pitru Sidar, Aged About 36 Years R/o Ward No. -14, Gram Panchayat-Hardi, Block - Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. P. Acharya, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No.7 to 10 : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board
2
08/07/2022
3
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Ved
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed with a direction to the Additional Commissioner to decide the underlying revision petition within 60 days.
Whether the status quo so far as the post of Sarpanch is concerned should be maintained till the final decision on the revision petition.
Whether it would be proper to enter into the merits of the dispute regarding the no-confidence motion at this juncture.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Deepmala Manhar
State Of Chhattisgarh
Fuleshwari Mahesh
Ramratan Patel
Omprakash Nirala
Sushil Sidar
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
