Petitioner filed a writ petition which became infructuous based on submission of its counsel. The High Court disposed of the petition as having become infructuous without engaging in detailed reasoning.
The writ petition was disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 2257 of 2022
Ram Avatar Suryavanshi S/o Baldau Suryavanshi Aged About 40 Years R/o Khamtarai Basti, Ps Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
07/07/2022 Mr. Sunil Kumar Soni, Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, GA for the State.
Mr. Jitendra Pali, counsel for the respondent/s.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has since become
infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off as having become
infructuous.
Rohit
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy)
Judge
Ram Avatar Suryavanshi
State Of Chhattisgarh
Honorable Chhattisgarh High Court
Jail Superintendent Central Jail Bilaspur
Titra Suryavanshi
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
